Nga Gurali Brahimllari<\/p>\n
N\u00eb praktik\u00ebn e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Strasburgut, ka gjetur vend edhe shqyrtimi i disa \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve q\u00eb lidhen me an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e \u201cOrganizat\u00ebs Terroriste Gyleniste..\u201d, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt jan\u00eb paraburgosur dhe m\u00eb pas jan\u00eb d\u00ebnuar nga gjykatat Turke, mbi baz\u00ebn e dyshimeve se kan\u00eb qen\u00eb p\u00ebrdorues t\u00eb nj\u00eb aplikacioni t\u00eb koduar mesazhesh t\u00eb njohur me emrin \u201cByLock. Sipas k\u00ebtyre vendimeve, rezulton se aplikacioni ByLock, ka funksionuar n\u00eb periudh\u00ebn e viteve 2014 \u2013 2016. Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb instaluar m\u00eb shum\u00eb se 100,000 her\u00eb, duke qen\u00eb, sipas autoriteteve turke, mjeti m\u00eb i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm i komunikimit p\u00ebr organizat\u00ebn Gyleniste.<\/p>\n
Rezulton se aplikacioni ByLock, i ka paraprir\u00eb krijimit t\u00eb platfomave t\u00eb reja, t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs familje, EncroChat dhe SkyECC. Ai patur disa karakteristika t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbashk\u00ebta me k\u00ebto t\u00eb fundit sepse komunikimi mes abonent\u00ebve ka qen\u00eb i koduar dhe realizohej n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet shk\u00ebmbimit t\u00eb mesazheve me ve\u00e7orin e fshirjes automatike t\u00eb tyre. Madje aplikacioni ByLock lejonte mesazhe t\u00eb \u00e7astit, thirrje zanore, mesazhe n\u00eb grup, ndarje skedar\u00ebsh dhe korrespondenc\u00eb me email, t\u00eb gjitha t\u00eb koduara. Sipas vendimeve t\u00eb autoriteteve gjyq\u00ebsore turke, pretendohet se n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet komunikimeve t\u00eb koduara, pjes\u00ebmarr\u00ebsit n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb organizat\u00eb, kan\u00eb koordinuar veprimet e tyre q\u00eb \u00e7uan n\u00eb grushtin e shtetit t\u00eb vitit 2016. Pas d\u00ebshtimit, mbi baz\u00ebn e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb aplikacionit t\u00eb koduar ByLock, jan\u00eb paraburosur dhe m\u00eb pas jan\u00eb gjykuar e d\u00ebnuar me masa t\u00eb r\u00ebnda, deri n\u00eb burgime t\u00eb p\u00ebrjet\u00ebshme, shum\u00eb shtetas turq. Prej vendimeve t\u00eb shumta me k\u00ebt\u00eb objekt, prezantojm\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb opinion konkluzionet e Dhom\u00ebs s\u00eb Madhe t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs, n\u00eb vendimet p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjen Akg\u00fcn t\u00eb shpallur n\u00eb dat\u00eb 20\/07\/2021 dhe n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen Y.Y. t\u00eb publikuar n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 26\/09\/2023.<\/p>\n
K\u00ebshtu n\u00eb vendimin e dat\u00ebs 20\/07\/2021, pas shqyrtimit t\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes Akg\u00fcn kund\u00ebr Turqis\u00eb Dhoma e Madhe ka konkluduar se: \u201cParaburgimi i nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkuesi t\u00eb dyshuar se i p\u00ebrket organizat\u00ebs FET\u00d6\/PDY p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb aplikacionit t\u00eb mesazheve ByLock p\u00ebrb\u00ebn shkelje e Konvent\u00ebs\u201d N\u00eb p\u00ebrmbajtjen e k\u00ebtij vendimi Gjykata sqaron se m\u00eb 17 tetor 2016, kur urdh\u00ebroi paraburgimin e k\u00ebrkuesit, gjykata e Ankaras\u00eb, nuk kishte informacion t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm mbi natyr\u00ebn e platform\u00ebs ByLock, p\u00ebr t\u00eb arritur n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se ky aplikacion p\u00ebr mesazhe t\u00eb koduara p\u00ebrdorej ekskluzivisht p\u00ebr komunikime vet\u00ebm nga an\u00ebtar\u00eb t\u00eb FET\u00d6\/PDY, me q\u00ebllimin e koordinimin e organizimit t\u00eb tyre t\u00eb brendsh\u00ebm. N\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb provave dhe\/ose informacioneve t\u00eb tjera, nuk provohej se aplikanti ishte me t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb p\u00ebrdorues i aplikacionit ByLock.<\/p>\n
Gjykata arriti n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se qeveria nuk kishte qen\u00eb n\u00eb gjendje t\u00eb tregonte se, n\u00eb dat\u00ebn n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn k\u00ebrkuesi u vendos n\u00eb paraburgim, provat n\u00eb dispozicion t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebs vendase kishin p\u00ebrmbushur standardin e \u201cdyshimit t\u00eb arsyesh\u00ebm\u201d t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar nga neni 5 i Konvent\u00ebs, t\u00eb tilla q\u00eb t\u00eb ishin t\u00eb atij niveli q\u00eb t\u00eb \u201ck\u00ebnaqinin\u201d nj\u00eb v\u00ebzhgues objektiv se k\u00ebrkuesi mund t\u00eb kishte kryer veprat p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilat ishte ndaluar.
\nPrandja Gjykata vendosi se kishte pasur shkelje t\u00eb nenit 5 \u00a7 1 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb munges\u00ebs s\u00eb dyshimit t\u00eb arsyesh\u00ebm, se ankuesi kishte kryer ndonj\u00eb vep\u00ebr penale.<\/p>\n
Gjykata vendosi gjithashtu, se kishte pasur shkelje t\u00eb nenit 5 \u00a7 3 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs, p\u00ebr shkak se gjykatat turke nuk kishin dh\u00ebn\u00eb arsye t\u00eb mjaftueshme p\u00ebr paraburgimin e ankuesit(pra vendimet nuk ishin t\u00eb arsyetuara sipas standeve t\u00eb GJEDNJ). Po k\u00ebshtu, Gjykata vler\u00ebsoi se as k\u00ebrkuesi dhe as avokati i tij nuk kishin patur mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb njiheshin mjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr thelbin e provave, t\u00eb cilat ishin t\u00eb disponueshme ekskluzivisht p\u00ebr prokurorin\u00eb, duke u c\u00ebnuar e drejta e mbrojtjes p\u00ebr kund\u00ebrshtimin e paraburgimit, prandaj kishte shkelje t\u00eb nenit 5 \u00a7 4 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e aplikantit Y.Y., t\u00eb shpallur n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 26 shtator 2023, Dhoma e Madhe, ka trajtuar gj\u00ebrsisht dhe n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimtare problematikat q\u00eb lidhen \u201cfaj\u00ebsin\u00eb\u201d e abonent\u00ebve t\u00eb aplikacionit ByLock dhe paligjshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e p\u00ebrdorimit si prov\u00eb t\u00eb rezultateve t\u00eb komunikimeve. Arsyetimet e Gjykat\u00ebs dhe konkluzionet e saj, hedhin drit\u00eb mbi garancit\u00eb e KEDNJ p\u00ebr t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn gjykimit t\u00eb drejt\u00eb dhe t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb rregullt ligjor, edhe p\u00ebr rastet e gjykimit t\u00eb personave q\u00eb akuzohen p\u00ebr vepra shum\u00eb t\u00eb r\u00ebnda penale, duke p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb edhe veprat terrorite.<\/p>\n
Duke theksuar faktin se abonimi n\u00eb nj\u00eb aplikacion t\u00eb enkriptuar, sikurse ishte Bylock, nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn vep\u00ebr penale, Gjykata ka konkluduar se p\u00ebrdorimi i k\u00ebtij aplikacioni, nuk mund t\u00eb sjell\u00eb, faj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr pjes\u00ebmarrje n\u00eb organizat\u00eb terroriste, sikurse kishte ndodhur me aplikantin Y.Y. Prandaj Dhoma e Madhe arriti n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se d\u00ebnimi i aplikantit nuk ka qen\u00eb n\u00eb p\u00ebrputhje me parimet e ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb dhe parashikueshm\u00ebris\u00eb, q\u00eb k\u00ebrkohen nga nenin 7 i KEDNJ. P\u00ebr Gjykat\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb i papranuesh\u00ebm \u201cD\u00ebnimi p\u00ebr an\u00ebtar\u00ebsim n\u00eb nj\u00eb organizat\u00eb t\u00eb armatosur terroriste bazuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb vendimtare n\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimin e aplikacionit t\u00eb koduar t\u00eb mesazheve ByLock, pa p\u00ebrcaktuar si\u00e7 duhet materialin p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebs t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs dhe element\u00ebt volitiv (mendor) n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb individualizuar\u2026\u201d Gjykata theksoi se \u201c Neni 7 p\u00ebrb\u00ebn nj\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb paderogueshme (absolute) dhe garancit\u00eb e tij nuk mund t\u00eb zbatohen n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb m\u00eb pak t\u00eb rrept\u00eb edhe n\u00eb lidhje me veprat terroriste t\u00eb supozuara t\u00eb kryera n\u00eb rrethana k\u00ebrc\u00ebnuese p\u00ebr jet\u00ebn e kombit\u2026\u201d.<\/p>\n
Po k\u00ebshtu, Gjykata ka konkluduar se \u00ebsht\u00eb c\u00ebnuar e drejta e aplikuesit p\u00ebr procesin e rregullt ligjor, t\u00eb garantuar nga nenit 6\/1 i KEDNJ sepse jan\u00eb dhunuar t\u00eb drejtat e mbrojtjes \u201c\u2026.p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb moszbulimit t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb pap\u00ebrpunuara t\u00eb marra nga serveri i aplikacionit t\u00eb mesazheve t\u00eb koduara, t\u00eb pabalancuara nga masat mbrojt\u00ebse procedurale t\u00eb p\u00ebshtatshme q\u00eb garantojn\u00eb drejt\u00ebsi t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjithshme t\u00eb procedurave.\u201d
\nGjykata, duke theksuar se t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn e mbrojtjes p\u00ebr aksesi n\u00eb materialin e dekriptuar ByLock, ka konstatur d\u00ebshtimin e gjykatave vendase \u201cp\u00ebr t\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb arsye p\u00ebr moszbulimin e kontestuar t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb pap\u00ebrpunuara dhe p\u00ebr t\u00eb adresuar \u00e7\u00ebshtjet thelb\u00ebsore q\u00eb lidhen me integritetin dhe vler\u00ebn provuese t\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave ByLock\u201d.
\nDhoma e Madhe e Gjykat\u00ebs ka konkluduar se provat e marra, qofshin ato elektronike ose jo, nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoren nga gjykatat vendase n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb cenon parimet baz\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb gjykimi t\u00eb drejt\u00eb. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb vendim arsyetohet se: Gjykata rithekson se provat elektronike q\u00eb v\u00ebrtetojn\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimin nga nj\u00eb individ t\u00eb nj\u00eb sistemi t\u00eb koduar mesazhesh .., n\u00eb parim, mund t\u00eb jen\u00eb shum\u00eb t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme n\u00eb luft\u00ebn kund\u00ebr terrorizmit ose krime t\u00eb tjeta t\u00eb organizuara. \u2026 Megjithat\u00eb, ndon\u00ebse lufta kund\u00ebr terrorizmit mund t\u00eb k\u00ebrkoj\u00eb p\u00ebrdorimin e provave t\u00eb tilla, e drejta p\u00ebr nj\u00eb gjykim t\u00eb drejt\u00eb, \u2026duhet t\u00eb zbatohet p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjitha llojet e veprave penale, nga ato m\u00eb t\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejtat deri te ato m\u00eb komplekse. E drejta p\u00ebr procesin e rregullt ligjor z\u00eb nj\u00eb vend kaq t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm n\u00eb nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebri demokratike saq\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb sakrifikohet \u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
Duke konstatuar shkeljet e k\u00ebrkesave t\u00eb nenit 6 t\u00eb KEDNJ dhe d\u00ebshtimet e gjykatave vendse p\u00ebr p\u00ebr t\u2019i mund\u00ebsuar k\u00ebrkuesit t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn q\u00eb t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtoj\u00eb, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb efektive, t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e enkriptuara t\u00eb aplikacionit ByLock, si dhe duke evidentuar munges\u00ebn e arsyetimit t\u00eb vendimeve t\u00eb Gjykatave turke p\u00ebr t\u00eb justifikuar d\u00ebnimin e aplikantit, Dhoma e Madhe ka konkluduar se, ka patur shkelje t\u00eb nenit 6 \u00a7 1 t\u00eb Konvent\u00ebs madje n\u00eb rastin e aplikantit Y.Y, ka theksuar se \u201cK\u00ebto d\u00ebshtime kishin efektet e MINIMIT T\u00cb BESIMIT Q\u00cb GJYKATAT, n\u00eb nj\u00eb shoq\u00ebri demokratike, DUHET T\u00cb FRYM\u00cbZOJN\u00cb TEK PUBLIKUN\u201d.<\/p>\n
Meqen\u00ebse jurisprudenca e GJEDNJ-s\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb udh\u00ebrr\u00ebfyese p\u00ebr organet ligjzbatuese n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha vendet e KiE, kemi bindjen se konkluzionet e Dhom\u00ebs s\u00eb Madhe, n\u00eb k\u00ebto dy \u00e7\u00ebshtje (por edhe n\u00eb shum\u00eb vendime t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb s\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs natyre) do t\u00eb ndihmojn\u00eb n\u00eb qart\u00ebsimin e debateve aktuale, n\u00eb lidhje me vler\u00ebsimin objektiv t\u00eb pretendimeve t\u00eb mbrojt\u00ebsve p\u00ebr pap\u00ebrdorshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e t\u00eb dh\u00ebnave t\u00eb komunikimeve t\u00eb enkriptuara t\u00eb platformave EncroChat, SkyECC, etj n\u00eb proceset penale q\u00eb kan\u00eb filluar dhe po vazhdojn\u00eb mbi baz\u00ebn e tyre si edhe p\u00ebr respektimin e t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb t\u00eb dyshuarve p\u00ebr procesin e rregullt ligjor. P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr q\u00eb t\u00eb dh\u00ebnat e komunikimeve t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre t\u00eb fundit, n\u00eb dallim nga rastet e aplikacionit ByLock, jan\u00eb p\u00ebrfuar prej paisjeve teknike t\u00eb krijuara enkas prej autoriteteve franceze, p\u00ebr realizimin e interceptimit t\u00eb bisedave, t\u00eb cilat kan\u00eb qen\u00eb t\u00eb afta edhe t\u00eb kryjenin edhe devijimin e fluksit t\u00eb bisedave t\u00eb zhvilluara n\u00eb koh\u00eb reale, n\u00eb nj\u00eb server t\u00eb dyt\u00eb, q\u00eb administrohet sot nga xhandarm\u00ebria Franceze.<\/p>\n
Avokat Gurali Brahimllari (ish ekspert i shkoll\u00ebs s\u00eb magjistratur\u00ebs n\u00eb programin trajtues t\u00eb gjyqtarve dhe prokuror\u00ebve, lidhur me bashk\u00ebpunimin gjyq\u00ebsor nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar n\u00eb fush\u00ebn penale) \/facenews.al<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nga Gurali Brahimllari N\u00eb praktik\u00ebn e Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Strasburgut, ka gjetur vend edhe shqyrtimi i disa \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve q\u00eb lidhen me an\u00ebtar\u00ebt e \u201cOrganizat\u00ebs Terroriste Gyleniste..\u201d, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt jan\u00eb paraburgosur dhe m\u00eb pas jan\u00eb d\u00ebnuar nga gjykatat Turke, mbi baz\u00ebn e dyshimeve se kan\u00eb qen\u00eb p\u00ebrdorues t\u00eb nj\u00eb aplikacioni t\u00eb koduar mesazhesh t\u00eb njohur me emrin […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2030,"featured_media":397497,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[241,3365,3366,5380,231],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-397496","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-aktualitet","8":"category-analize","9":"category-koment","10":"category-kryesore","11":"category-lajme"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397496","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2030"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=397496"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397496\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":397499,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397496\/revisions\/397499"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/397497"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=397496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=397496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=397496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}