N\u00eb shumic\u00eb, subjektet e vetingut jan\u00eb nd\u00ebshkuar edhe p\u00ebr \u201ccenim t\u00eb besimit t\u00eb publikut te drejt\u00ebsia\u201d, nd\u00ebrsa nj\u00eb num\u00ebr m\u00eb i vog\u00ebl kan\u00eb rezultuar me pasuri sa dyfishi i asaj q\u00eb mund t\u00eb argumentonin ligj\u00ebrisht. Komisioni i Pavarur i Kualifikimit ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb vler\u00ebsime edhe p\u00ebr zyrtar\u00ebt q\u00eb i mbijetuan procesit. P\u00ebr 3 nga 12 gjykat\u00ebsit e prokuror\u00ebt e konfirmuar, KPK-ja ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb vler\u00ebsim minimal t\u00eb aft\u00ebsive profesionale, n\u00eb kat\u00ebr raste vler\u00ebsimi ka qen\u00eb maksimal, nd\u00ebrsa n\u00eb rastet e tjera subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb cil\u00ebsuar \u201ci pranuesh\u00ebm\u201d apo \u201ci mjaftuesh\u00ebm\u201d.<\/p>\n
Procesi i vetingut apo i rivler\u00ebsimit t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebsve dhe prokuror\u00ebve n\u00eb vend filloi n\u00eb muajin mars t\u00eb k\u00ebtij viti me seancat d\u00ebgjimore p\u00ebr 57 subjektet e list\u00ebs prioritare, p\u00ebrfshi kandidat\u00eb p\u00ebr institucionet e reja t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe an\u00ebtar\u00eb t\u00eb K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Em\u00ebrimeve n\u00eb Drejt\u00ebsi. Pas 48 seancash d\u00ebgjimore, deri n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb gushtit jan\u00eb shkarkuar 27 gjyqtar\u00eb dhe prokuror\u00eb dhe jan\u00eb rikonfirmuar n\u00eb detyr\u00eb 21 subjekte.<\/p>\n
Megjithat\u00eb, nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb e mir\u00eb e vendimeve t\u00eb shkarkimit jan\u00eb apeluar nga gjykat\u00ebsit dhe prokuror\u00ebt n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit (KPA). Po ashtu, edhe disa prej konfirmimeve nga KPK-ja jan\u00eb apeluar nga Komisioneri Publik edhe me k\u00ebmb\u00ebnguljen e Operacionit Nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtar t\u00eb Monitorimit, p\u00ebrfshi k\u00ebtu edhe konfirmimin n\u00eb detyr\u00eb t\u00eb kryetarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, Bashkim Dedja. Deri tani, KPA-ja ka marr\u00eb dy vendime n\u00eb dhom\u00eb k\u00ebshillimi pa i d\u00ebrguar \u00e7\u00ebshtjet n\u00eb seanc\u00eb gjyq\u00ebsore, duke i dh\u00ebn\u00eb form\u00eb t\u00eb prer\u00eb shkarkimit t\u00eb ish-an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, Fatos Lulo, dhe ish-an\u00ebtarit t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Apelit Durr\u00ebs, Besim Trezhnjeva.<\/p>\n
ARSYET PAS SHKARKIMEVE<\/p>\n
Procesi mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb ndryshimet kushtetuese t\u00eb ver\u00ebs s\u00eb vitit 2016 dhe ligjit nr. 84\/2016 p\u00ebr \u201cRivler\u00ebsimin kalimtar t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebsve dhe prokuror\u00ebve\u201d, i cili parashikon n\u00eb nenin 61 se shkarkimi vendoset p\u00ebr pes\u00eb arsye q\u00eb p\u00ebrfshijn\u00eb: deklarimin e m\u00eb shum\u00eb se dyfishin e pasuris\u00eb q\u00eb mund t\u00eb justifikohet me t\u00eb ardhura t\u00eb ligjshme, kontaktet me krimin e organizuar apo kontaktet e pap\u00ebrshtatshme, deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr kriterin e kontrollit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs dhe pasuris\u00eb, paaft\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe n\u00eb pik\u00ebn e pest\u00eb \u201ccenimin e besimit t\u00eb publikut te drejt\u00ebsia\u201d.<\/p>\n
BIRN gjeti pas nj\u00eb analize t\u00eb vendimeve t\u00eb zbardhura, se n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha rastet kur \u00ebsht\u00eb aplikuar shkarkimi, gjykat\u00ebsit dhe prokuror\u00ebt e shkarkuar kishin b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm \u201cp\u00ebr kriterin e kontrollit t\u00eb figur\u00ebs dhe pasuris\u00eb\u201d, sipas pik\u00ebs 3 t\u00eb nenit 61, t\u00eb ligjit 84 p\u00ebr \u201cRivler\u00ebsimin kalimtar t\u00eb gjykat\u00ebsve dhe prokuror\u00ebve\u201d. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb tri raste n\u00eb vendimet e zbardhura, KPK-ja thot\u00eb se ve\u00e7 shkeljes s\u00eb pik\u00ebs tre, \u00ebsht\u00eb provuar se ishte \u201ccenuar besimi i publikut te drejt\u00ebsia\u201d.<\/p>\n
K\u00ebtu p\u00ebrfshiheshin an\u00ebtarja e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese Altina Xhoxhaj, gjykat\u00ebsi Besim Trezhnjeva dhe prokurori Gentian Trenova. N\u00eb 2 raste, p\u00ebrfshi ishan\u00ebtarin e Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese Fatos Lulo dhe prokuroren Besa Nik\u00ebhasani, shkarkimi \u00ebsht\u00eb dh\u00ebn\u00eb p\u00ebr mosp\u00ebrmbushje t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 3 dhe po ashtu pik\u00ebs nj\u00eb t\u00eb ligjit, nd\u00ebrsa KPK-ja ka arsyetuar se pasuria e deklaruar prej tyre ishte m\u00eb shum\u00eb se dyfishi i pasuris\u00eb q\u00eb mund t\u00eb justifikohej nga t\u00eb ardhurat e ligjshme. N\u00eb dy nga 7 shkarkimet, subjektet jan\u00eb konsideruar shkel\u00ebs t\u00eb vet\u00ebm nj\u00ebr\u00ebs prej 5 pikave. Sipas vendimeve t\u00eb zbardhura, an\u00ebtari i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, Fatmir Hoxha, dhe prokurori i Apelit, Luan Kalo\u00e7i, nuk kishin b\u00ebr\u00eb \u201cdeklarim t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm\u201d p\u00ebr kriterin e pasuris\u00eb. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, n\u00eb rastin e prokurorit Gentian Trenova, KPK-ja thot\u00eb se shkarkimi \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb bazuar n\u00eb tri pika t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin. Trenova, sipas treshes s\u00eb KPK-s\u00eb q\u00eb shqyrtoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen e tij, kishte b\u00ebr\u00eb deklarim t\u00eb pamjaftuesh\u00ebm, ka cenuar besimin e publikut te drejt\u00ebsia dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb cil\u00ebsuar i paaft\u00eb profesionalisht.<\/p>\n
VLER\u00cbSIMI I PROFESIONALIZMIT<\/p>\n
Profesionalizmi sidoqoft\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb shqyrtuar gjer\u00ebsisht n\u00eb rastet kur gjykat\u00ebsit dhe prokuror\u00ebt kan\u00eb marr\u00eb konfirmimin, ku shumica e \u201ckaluesve\u201d jan\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar nga KPK-ja me cil\u00ebsimet \u201caft\u00ebsi minimale, aft\u00ebsi t\u00eb mjaftueshme dhe aft\u00ebsi t\u00eb pranueshme\u201d. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb rast, relatori i cili b\u00ebn edhe vler\u00ebsimin profesional, \u00ebsht\u00eb shprehur se \u201cNuk kishte dyshim p\u00ebr aft\u00ebsit\u00eb\u201d. Ligji p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin ka parashikuar n\u00eb fakt tri shkall\u00eb p\u00ebr kriterin e aft\u00ebsis\u00eb profesionale: \u201cI aft\u00eb, me mang\u00ebsi dhe i pap\u00ebrshtatsh\u00ebm\u201d.<\/p>\n
Nga vendimet e zbardhura deri tani, BIRN-i gjeti se n\u00eb t\u00eb gjitha rastet e konfirmimit n\u00eb detyr\u00eb KPK-ja i ka cil\u00ebsuar gjykat\u00ebsit apo prokuror\u00ebt t\u00eb aft\u00eb, duke aplikuar vet\u00eb pik\u00ebn e par\u00eb t\u00eb nenit 44, t\u00eb ligjit p\u00ebr rivler\u00ebsimin dhe megjith\u00ebse ka shprehur rezerva n\u00eb disa raste, duke i cil\u00ebsuar aft\u00ebsit\u00eb minimale, nuk ka aplikuar deri tani t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr t\u00eb rekomanduar program trajnimi pran\u00eb Shkoll\u00ebs s\u00eb Magjistratur\u00ebs. N\u00eb nj\u00eb nga k\u00ebto raste, KPK-ja gjeti si\u00e7 thuhet n\u00eb vendimin e zbardhur p\u00ebr gjyqtaren Alma Brati, vendime t\u00eb cilave u mungonte qart\u00ebsia apo ishin shkruar me gabime drejtshkrimore.<\/p>\n
Me vler\u00ebsim minimal kaloi procesin edhe gjyqtarja e Apelit t\u00eb Vlor\u00ebs, Brikena Ukperaj, por n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast KPK-ja gjeti si problem vonesat n\u00eb zbardhjen e vendimeve. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb, me not\u00ebn \u201cpranuesh\u00ebm\u201d n\u00eb aft\u00ebsit\u00eb profesionale u vler\u00ebsua Kryeprokurorja Arta Marku dhe prokurorja Anila Leka. N\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin profesional t\u00eb Markut, KPK-ja tha se gjeti \u201cmang\u00ebsi formale\u201d, por nuk i cil\u00ebsoi k\u00ebto si \u201cshkarkuese\u201d.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb disa raste t\u00eb tjera, p\u00ebrfshi at\u00eb t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebses Kushtetuese, Vitore Tushe, KPK-ja nuk ka b\u00ebr\u00eb cil\u00ebsim t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb t\u00eb aft\u00ebsive, por ka theksuar se subjekti arrinte \u201cnivel t\u00eb besuesh\u00ebm\u201d. M\u00eb mir\u00eb n\u00eb vler\u00ebsimin profesional kan\u00eb rezultuar kreu i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese, Bashkim Dedja, prokurori i Krimeve t\u00eb R\u00ebnda, Dritan Pren\u00e7i, an\u00ebtari i Gjykat\u00ebs s\u00eb Lart\u00eb, Edmond Islamaj, dhe gjyqtarja Mar\u00e7ela Shehu.<\/p>\n
T\u00eb kat\u00ebrt, sipas KPKs\u00eb, kan\u00eb treguar profesionaliz\u00ebm t\u00eb lart\u00eb. Megjithat\u00eb, Dedja dhe Islamaj nuk e kan\u00eb mbyllur procesin, pasi vendimet p\u00ebr konfirmimin e tyre jan\u00eb ankimuar tashm\u00eb nga Komisioneri Publik dhe pritet t\u00eb shqyrtohen edhe n\u00eb Kolegjin e Posa\u00e7\u00ebm t\u00eb Apelimit.\/BIRN<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kontrolli i pasuris\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb nd\u00ebr tri kriteret ky\u00e7e t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb vetingut p\u00ebr gjyqtar\u00ebt dhe prokuror\u00ebt e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb. Megjithat\u00eb, ky kriter \u00ebsht\u00eb testuar si m\u00eb efikasi n\u00eb praktik\u00ebn e deritanishme t\u00eb Komisionit t\u00eb Pavarur t\u00eb Kualifikimit, duke rr\u00ebzuar shumic\u00ebn e gjyqtar\u00ebve dhe prokuror\u00ebve t\u00eb shkarkuar nga sistemi. Nj\u00eb analiz\u00eb e vendimeve t\u00eb arsyetuara t\u00eb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2044,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[241,235],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-46633","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-aktualitet","7":"category-vendi"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2044"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46633\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}