Gjykata Kushtetuese ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e nj\u00eb grupi deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Partis\u00eb Demokratike, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt k\u00ebrkonin shfuqizimin e dekretit t\u00eb Presidentit p\u00ebr em\u00ebrimin e \u201cministres Diella\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
K\u00ebrkesa e deputet\u00ebve t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs ishte paraqitur n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese, duke kund\u00ebrshtuar dekretin presidencial lidhur me em\u00ebrimin e \u201cDiell\u00ebs\u201d n\u00eb qeveri.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Me vendimin e saj, Gjykata Kushtetuese ka vendosur t\u00eb mos pranoj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e deputet\u00ebve t\u00eb PD-s\u00eb, duke l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb fuqi dekretin e Presidentit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
VENDIMI:
Gjykata Kushtetuese, n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 26.05.2026, mori n\u00eb shqyrtim n\u00eb seanc\u00eb plenare mbi baz\u00eb t\u00eb dokumenteve \u00e7\u00ebshtjen, n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb nr. grup prej 39 deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Kuvendit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb (Kuvendit), n\u00eb cil\u00ebsin\u00eb e subjektit kushtetues jo m\u00eb pak se nj\u00eb e pesta e deputet\u00ebve (k\u00ebrkuesi), me objekt: \u201cShfuqizimin e nenit 2 te dekretit nr. 331, dat\u00eb 12.09.2025, t\u00eb Presidentit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cP\u00ebr em\u00ebrimin e Kryeministrit\u201d, si t\u00eb papajtuesh\u00ebm me Kushtetut\u00ebn e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb. Shfuqizimi i nenit 1, pika 1, fjalia e dyt\u00eb, t\u00eb dekretit nr. 333, dat\u00eb 15.09.2025, t\u00eb Presidentit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb \u201cP\u00ebr em\u00ebrimin e K\u00ebshillit t\u00eb Ministrave\u201d, si t\u00eb papajtuesh\u00ebm me Kushtetut\u00ebn e Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb.\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Gjykata Kushtetuese e mbledhur sot n\u00eb dat\u00ebn 08.10.2026, pasi shqyrtoi objektin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, natyr\u00ebn e thelbin e pretendimeve t\u00eb parashtruara nga k\u00ebrkuesi, si dhe prap\u00ebsimet e subjekteve t\u00eb interesuara v\u00ebrejti se:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
S\u00eb pari, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje e re, p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn nuk ka pasur q\u00ebndrime t\u00eb m\u00ebhershme n\u00eb kontekstin e inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
S\u00eb dyti, p\u00ebrdorimi i inteligjenc\u00ebs artificiale nuk mund t\u00eb ndryshoj\u00eb rendin kushtetues dhe ligjor t\u00eb ushtrimit t\u00eb kompetencave publike, t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsis\u00eb dhe llogaridh\u00ebnies. P\u00ebrdorimi i nj\u00eb mjeti teknologjik nuk mund t\u00eb krijoj\u00eb, zgjeroj\u00eb, transferoj\u00eb ose z\u00ebvend\u00ebsoj\u00eb k\u00ebto kompetenca. N\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb buron nga parimi i shtetit t\u00eb s\u00eb drejt\u00ebs dhe ligjshm\u00ebris\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
S\u00eb treti, n\u00eb rastin konkret, k\u00ebrkuesi ka pretenduar, n\u00eb thelb, se p\u00ebrmes dekretve t\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtuara, Presidenti ka krijuar nj\u00eb struktur\u00eb t\u00eb re ministrore dhe i ka ngarkuar Kryeministrit nj\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi q\u00eb nuk buron nga Kushtetuta ose ligji, duke cenuar kompetencat kushtetuese t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb tjera dhe garancit\u00eb kushtetuese p\u00ebr em\u00ebrimin e ministrit. Mb\u00ebshtetur mbi k\u00ebto argumente dhe parashtruesit baz\u00ebs ligjore t\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhur nga k\u00ebrkuesi, Gjykata e vler\u00ebsoi \u00e7\u00ebshtjen sipas natyr\u00ebs dhe objektit t\u00eb saj, duke analizuar kompetenc\u00ebn e saj t\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar nga shkronjat \u201cc\u201d, \u201c\u00e7\u201d, dhe \u201ce\u201d t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 1 t\u00eb nenit 131 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lidhur me shkronj\u00ebn \u201cc\u201d t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 1 t\u00eb nenit 131 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb parim kjo dispozit\u00eb i jep kompetenc\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs p\u00ebr t\u00eb vendosur p\u00ebr pajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb e akteve normative t\u00eb organeve qendrore dhe vendore me Kushtetut\u00ebn dhe me marr\u00ebveshjet nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare, N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen konkrete, Gjykata arrin n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundimin se formulimi i kund\u00ebrshtuar \u00ebsht\u00eb i aft\u00eb t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb nj\u00eb efekt juridik individual ndaj Kryeministrit, por nuk rezulton se ai ka efekt kushtetues autonom p\u00ebr krijimin e kompetencave ose strukturave t\u00eb reja dhe n\u00eb \u00e7do rast efekti i tij nuk ka karakter normativ. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, \u00e7\u00ebshtja nuk mund t\u00eb shqyrtohet bazuar n\u00eb nenin 131, pika 1, shkronja \u201cc\u201d t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lidhur me shkronj\u00ebn \u201c\u00e7\u201d t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 1 t\u00eb nenit 131 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb parim kjo dispozit\u00eb parashikon kompetenc\u00ebn e Gjykat\u00ebs p\u00ebr mosmarr\u00ebveshjet e kompetenc\u00ebs nd\u00ebrmjet pushteteve. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen konkrete, Gjykata \u00e7mon se ekzistenca e nj\u00eb mosmarr\u00ebveshjeje kompetencash me natyr\u00eb kushtetuese nuk mund t\u00eb varet nga q\u00ebndrimi i shprehur i organeve t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshira as ato ndodhen n\u00eb konflikt, por nga natyra e kompetencave t\u00eb pretenduara dhe nga fakti q\u00eb akti ose sjellja e nj\u00eb organi mund t\u00eb ket\u00eb mbi sfer\u00ebn e kompetencave kushtetuese t\u00eb nj\u00eb organi tjet\u00ebr. Nga ana tjet\u00ebr, \u00e7\u00ebshtja n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb konkrete legjitimohet p\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00eb ngritur nj\u00eb mosmarr\u00ebveshje t\u00eb till\u00eb lidhur me legjitimitetin e tij ratione personae, kriter t\u00eb cilin ai nuk e p\u00ebrmbush, pasi nuk rezulton as subjekt n\u00eb konflikt dhe as subjekt i cenuar drejtp\u00ebrdrejt prej tij. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, \u00e7\u00ebshtja nuk mund t\u00eb shqyrtohet bazuar n\u00eb nenin 131, pika 1, shkronja \u201c\u00e7\u201d t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lidhur me shkronj\u00ebn \u201ce\u201d t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 1 t\u00eb nenit 131 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb parim kjo dispozit\u00eb p\u00ebrcakton kompetenc\u00ebn e Gjykat\u00ebs p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtjet q\u00eb lidhen me zgjedhshm\u00ebrin\u00eb dhe papajtueshm\u00ebrin\u00eb n\u00eb ushtrimin e funksioneve t\u00eb funksionar\u00ebve t\u00eb organeve t\u00eb parashikuara n\u00eb Kushtetut\u00eb, si dhe me verifikimin e zgjedhjes s\u00eb tyre, ku p\u00ebrfshihen edhe organi kushtetues i ministrit. N\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen konkrete, Gjykata evidenton se pavar\u00ebsisht terminologjis\u00eb s\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur n\u00eb dekretet e kund\u00ebrshtuara, nuk rezulton se kemi t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb me nj\u00eb funksionar konkret kushtetues, zgjedhshm\u00ebria, papajtueshm\u00ebria ose zgjedhja\/em\u00ebrimi i t\u00eb cilit mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebj\u00eb objekt kontrolli sipas shkronj\u00ebs \u201ce\u201d t\u00eb pik\u00ebs 1 t\u00eb nenit 131 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs. P\u00ebr rrjedhoj\u00eb, Gjykata \u00e7mon se ajo nuk mund ta shqyrtoj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjen as mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb baz\u00eb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
N\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim, Gjykata me shumic\u00eb votash vendosi rr\u00ebzimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gjykata Kushtetuese ka rr\u00ebzuar k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e nj\u00eb grupi deputet\u00ebsh t\u00eb Partis\u00eb Demokratike, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt k\u00ebrkonin shfuqizimin e dekretit t\u00eb Presidentit p\u00ebr em\u00ebrimin e \u201cministres Diella\u201d. K\u00ebrkesa e deputet\u00ebve t\u00eb opozit\u00ebs ishte paraqitur n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Kushtetuese, duke kund\u00ebrshtuar dekretin presidencial lidhur me em\u00ebrimin e \u201cDiell\u00ebs\u201d n\u00eb qeveri. Me vendimin e saj, Gjykata Kushtetuese ka vendosur t\u00eb […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2013,"featured_media":431562,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[241,5380,231,1454,235],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-431561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-aktualitet","category-kryesore","category-lajme","category-politike","category-vendi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2013"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=431561"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431561\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":431563,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/431561\/revisions\/431563"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/431562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=431561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=431561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zjarr.tv\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=431561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}