By Andi Bushati
There are a series of episodes from Xjisiela Maloku’s two interviews that show that she was only physically in the studios of “Opinion” and “Open”. The words of the 25-year-old hostage were part of the script prepared by her rapists. And here we are not talking about the funny version that she, like her boyfriend, burned herself with cigarettes from time to time. It is not even about the ugly lie that the signs of violence were the result of a previous car accident (when she immediately went to do the forensic examination).
There are some smaller details that reveal it.
Since she gave her first interview, word spread that Gisila was being escorted to the television studio by her rapists.
This was confirmed on Monday evening at the “Open”.
While she, part of a family where the two sisters are unemployed and where they live only on the mother’s salary, stated that she had gone from Nikla to Durrës by taxi, journalist Anila Hoxha testified that she was brought with a private car.
Why should he lie, so as not to conspire against those who hold him hostage?
The second episode took place in Fevzi’s studio. She was there, giving an interview and facing the journalists, and when she was asked about what she had said on Top Channel, where she was speaking at the same time, she declared: “The interview on “Open” was manipulated.”
Where did she have the opportunity to watch what Top Channel had broadcast, or were her rapists sent a message?
The third episode: Journalist Eni Vasili has recently stated that Xisiela was not satisfied with the interview given to her on Sunday and she insisted that it not be broadcast that she had been ordered to tell a new version in “Opinion”. Eni Vasili claims that she also saved the messages that show this.
Why should he give a second version, because the rapists did not like the first one?
The fourth episode: when the journalist Klodiana Lala confronted him at Fevziu’s studio with the alibi that the physical injuries caused in a car accident (the alibi that he was forced to say much more faintly in “Opinion”) were not what he was talking about forensic expertise, poor Gisiel, who did not have an immediate attitude, was caught tight and abandoned the studio where she should put her face on the tricks that the masters of the renaissance had cooked up.
So these two shows, which tried to be manipulated by her rapists, to make an alibi of their innocence, proved something else. They showed that Gisila is a captive. That she is piloted, marked, tapped and continues to be raped by people who have been doing this systematically for a year.
By this point, I believe everyone who saw those interviews understood.
But the problem is that this story has crossed the boundaries of a monstrous relationship between the executioner and the victim. Now the executioner has become the entire power that is allowing this crime to continue. That’s why today’s show was not a boomerang for MP Rahja and his son who just petted the “jealous woman”, but for the entire Orwellian propaganda machine behind them./Lapsi/
